Skip to content
Sip Curator
BenRiach Horizons 12 Year
Benriach

BenRiach Horizons 12 Year

3.22 Mixed reviews

18 reviews18 ratings

84 critic score

Whiskey Scotch Speyside 12 years 50% ABV

Tried it?

How was this pour?

Score this bottle

Rating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.

About this bottle

Triple distilled single malt Scotch whiskies are uncommon in Scotland, with Auchentoshan and Hazelburn being other examples. BenRiach, however, demonstrates a commitment to innovation. This expression is initially matured in ex-bourbon casks before undergoing a finishing period in Oloroso casks. A notable feature is its bottling at 100 proof.

How it tastes

Measured across 14 flavor axes. Tap a note to find other bottles that lead with it.

Rich 60
Spicy 60
Fruity 60
Tart 50
Sweet 50
Oily 40
Herbal 40

Reviews

Showing the most detailed of 4 parsed reviews.

Dominique Birch 1.3

Rating: 6/23 Nose: There's surprisingly little aroma here. After a few moments, an oily characteristic emerges. Then I detect a slight bitter herbal smell. It immediately brings to mind Sir Edward's 12 and Glen Logie, giving the impression of a cheap blend rather than a single malt. I don't really get much alcohol on the nose; I assume what I do detect is mostly present because there isn't much else. There's a hint of something floral with some pear and lemon, or perhaps artificial citron like Veil Citron. It's a really poor nose. Palate: This is quite oily, decently malty, and rather harsh. There's some nuttiness to the oil, but it's somewhat rancid. Sure, it's a bit spicy, but mostly harsh. It tastes better than the nose suggests, with some flavor of not entirely artificial tart au citron appearing, but there isn't much complexity, and I'm not particularly fond of the flavors present. There's more malt than I anticipated, and it does taste like it could be about 12 years old, but it has a surprisingly bitter graininess and an unpleasant rubbery bitterness to the oil. It's not enjoyable, complex, or much of anything. Finish: Oily with bitter rubber and a touch of richness. Some of that citron flavor. The harshness lingers somewhat. I can't say this is a pleasant finish. The most obvious comparison is Sir Edward's 12. Sir Edward's offers more complexity and refinement, but also more alcohol and slightly less richness. It's a bit of a trade-off, but I prefer Sir Edward's. I wouldn't say this is as bad as Glen Logie (the other obvious comparison) or Pure Scot (the other other obvious comparison due to the harshness), but it's bad. I'll rate it one point below Sir Edwards. I would definitely choose the BenRiach 10 over this. I'm genuinely puzzled about the purpose of bottling this at 50% or why it was released at all, given its problematic profile. I'm so incredibly glad I didn't buy a bottle of this one – there's no way it's worth anything close to $75. I'm giving it a 4-7 range and landing on a 6 because it does at least possess some decent malt flavor that suggests a bit of age.

Ramona Mayo 5.0

Nose: I just recovered from COVID and don't smell much. It's unfortunate. Palate: Nutty flavors like peanuts, hazelnuts, and almonds. It's buttery and creamy, like a shortbread cookie. Adding a little water brings out honey, sweetness, and fruitiness. It has a classy, heavy mouthfeel but no smoke. This is a heavy scotch, and I love it. As a side note, I'm amazed by its natural color. It's so dark, perhaps from the Oloroso Sherry cask.

Ryann Cooney 4.0

The sherry finish is prominent on the nose. On the palate, it's sweet, zesty, and citrusy. A wonderfully long finish adds chocolate to the profile. A 10-year version has replaced this bottling and is available in travel retail, but a few more bottles are appearing on the market because some overlooked cases were found in a Brown Forman warehouse.

Jarvis Moe 3.0

Lightly peated, very well-rounded, and an enjoyable mid-range scotch.

Tastes like this

Closest flavor profiles across the whole catalog.

All Scotch