Delamain Pale & Dry XO Cognac

Rating: 17/23 Appearance: This brandy is lighter than Pierre Ferrand Double Cask, likely due to its "Pale" characteristic. Nose: Exhibits dryness with a subtle waxy orange peel. Further investigation reveals a hint of candied orange, faint mellow wood, and spice. Palate: Dry, smooth, and light, with a fruitiness akin to diluted orange Jello. As it develops, a strong bitter character emerges, reminiscent of wood with a trace of creosote, which then softens. Hints of spice dance on the palate. It possesses a refined quality, much like fine champagne, rather than tasting particularly young. Its subtle nuances are difficult to articulate but keep me engaged. While less assertive than Pierre Ferrand Double Cask, it also has a less pronounced alcohol presence. However, I wish it were less of a challenge and it does not compare to A De Fussigny XO. Finish: The finish is quite pleasing, with the lingering orange Jello flavor accompanied by a faint bitter orange oil and subtle woody spices. Conclusion: Initially disappointing, this brandy grew on me. It's a fine drink, though very mellow and subtle, suited for those seeking a smooth experience over an engaging one. Scores between 14 and 17 are considered. A score of 17 is the highest I would consider. Comparing it directly to Pierre Ferrand Double Cask was confusing due to their differences. While I could likely identify the Pierre Ferrand as not being very old, guessing the age of this one is harder. Its smoothness suggests significant aging, similar to scotches that have rested in old barrels for extended periods. If offered a bottle of either at the same price, I would choose this one, appreciating its evident maturity and sophistication over the Pierre Ferrand. However, A De Fussigny XO surpasses both. I'm now reconsidering my initial assessment and believe it might be an 18, moving past a 14. This is now a solid 17, surprising given my initial impression. The decision between 16 and 17 was difficult, but I'm settled on 17. My initial sip led me to believe it wouldn't score this high. I also sampled ABK6 VSOP, which had a similar profile but was sweeter and less sophisticated. While I enjoyed both, this is superior. I previously rated the ABK6 VS a 14, which might have been generous, but I'm confident it's at least a 14. This is better, so it should be at least a 15, though that feels low. Comparing it to Rémy Martin 1738, the Rémy was better than I recalled but not at the level of Delamain. Realistically, this is a 16 or 17. I'm retracting the possibility of an 18. I'll settle on a 17. My initial impression truly misled me. I wavered between 16 and 17 but am now firm on 17. Thanks to a friend for sharing this!

It's a great option and a nice change from the common cognacs flooding the market. At least in Mexico, it's not widely known, so its earthier notes like wood, soil, and French bakery scents are more noticeable.

Brilliant deep straw to light gold color; not pale at all. Intense aroma of apple, pear, flowers, cold pineapple, and light peach over cool, rain-dampened rock. Medium-bodied texture on the attack. Fruit-forward with elegant apple and mineral texture. Light orange zest. Dry, yet smooth and with good length. No overpowering oak or spices; truly transparent and refreshing. Fantastic. B6 l5 i5 c5 s5

This excellent 25 year old XO Cognac has no added sugar or coloring. It is fruity and dry, which I prefer. It offers great value and is my favorite.

Raisins and yellow apple, yellow peach. Vanilla, butter. Starts smooth, then sweet (raisins and apple, caramel) and nutty in the middle. Ends soft and quite dry.

It's like a grape cloud descending your throat. Unmatched in its price bracket. Simply superb for the cost.