It was a welcome sight at the store, as I'd assumed cask strength Maker's Mark (classic or 46) was quite rare. However, it wasn't in the 'rare' section and was priced at only $45! While Maker's Mark has strong brand recognition and has likely reached its peak, it's still surprising that most of their products cost less than some new 2-year, 80-proof mediocrity. I appreciate the detailed batch information on the labels, which adds a personal touch, even though the distillery itself feels increasingly like a factory, despite its beautiful grounds. The proof and age are almost perfect for me, but as always, you get what you pay for, and this is still an amazing value. The color is very deep, darker than golden brown, leaning towards maple. The legs are quite sticky, and the aroma is strong and spicy, but not with typical rye notes of cinnamon or mint. Instead, it offers softer baking spices (reminiscent of banana bread or carrot cake), indicative of full-strength, well-aged wheat. The age nearly eliminates raw corn notes, allowing barrel sweetness to enhance the soft wheat flavors. The ethanol is present but not overwhelming, contributing a lingering phantom rye-like spice. The initial taste is surprisingly young corn/wheat mash, despite the considerable age. The ethanol intensifies quickly but then plateaus. The raw grain flavor persists as it moves along the gum line, with subtle notes of bitter cacao and floral hints (I dislike being overly specific, but there's a touch of what I perceive as chamomile) attempting to break through. The finish is hot but not burning, allowing the last taste of toasted oak (noticeably lacking the sweetness found in the aroma) to gradually fade. The adage 'you get what you pay for' often holds true. The American whiskey market, understandably, has many exceptions, but in this instance, the price felt too good to be true. Despite 7 years not qualifying as 'young' for bourbon, it retains significant raw grain flavor, similar to tasting mash directly from a fermentation tank. It's unusual for me to dislike a cask strength version compared to its diluted counterpart, but aside from a full and spicy body, this lacks many redeeming qualities. That said, a previous tasting of cask strength 46 confirmed my belief that it's the standard Maker's Mark, lacking inherent character, that doesn't truly shine.
Maker's Mark Cask Strength Batch 25-01 (112.6 Proof)
3.25 Mixed reviews
Whiskey Bourbon Kentucky 7 years 56.3% ABV
Tried it?
How was this pour?
Score this bottleRating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.
Reviews
Showing the most detailed of 1 parsed reviews.
Tastes like this
Same style and price bracket, best rated first.