Skip to content
Sip Curator
I.W. Harper Straight Bourbon
I.W. Harper

I.W. Harper Straight Bourbon

3.57 Decent

765 reviews765 ratings

94 critic score

Whiskey Bourbon Kentucky No age statement 41% ABV

Tried it?

How was this pour?

Score this bottle

Rating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.

About this bottle

The I.W. Harper brand dates back to the 1870s, established by Isaac Wolf and Bernard Bernheim. The brand was reintroduced to the US market in 2015. This straight bourbon is a composite of whiskeys aged between 4 and 20 years at the Stitzel-Weller warehouse, featuring a mash bill of 73% corn, 18% rye, and 9% malted barley.

How it tastes

Measured across 14 flavor axes. Tap a note to find other bottles that lead with it.

Rich 80
Sweet 75
Fruity 60
Spicy 40
Vanilla 30
Oily 10
Tart 10

Reviews

Showing the most detailed of 50 parsed reviews.

Myrna Whiteside 3.3

Back in May of 2022, I first tasted and wrote about I.W. Harper when my Bourbon journey was still quite new. My perspective on it has evolved with time and experience. I'm not saying I dislike it or that it's no longer good; that's not the case. However, it simply lacks depth and complexity. Perhaps drinking this 82 proof spirit after a weekend of much older, higher proof whiskeys is what I'm experiencing tonight. It can't compete with them, and I needed to return to a simpler profile. My original review follows this updated one. Appearance: Medium-light copper. Smell: Subtle oak and classic low-proof honey notes — I believe. Taste: It drinks a bit young. I'm unsure of this bottle's age, but it strikes me as somewhat youthful now, especially after trying numerous higher proof bottles (some significantly higher) since my initial tasting. There's a respectable amount of sweetness, and it's far better than some young Bourbons I've encountered. It is, however, quite "light." It bears a slight resemblance to Cyrus Nobel, if you're familiar with that one. Aftertaste: Brief with some lingering sweetness. I once considered this among my absolute favorites, initially awarding it 4.5 stars! Even as recently as this past April, I was praising it enthusiastically. But I now recognize that it doesn't warrant such high regard. It's a pleasant and enjoyable pour at a lower proof. However, it's not something worth going to extreme lengths to find, as I was doing before obtaining this latest bottle. ~ Original review from 5/14/22: This is a smooth and sweet spirit. Caramel and toffee on the nose, which carry through to the palate. It immediately earns Top Shelf status! This perfectly embodies why I love bourbon and how it ought to be. Added 4/26/24: After almost two years and tasting dozens of different bottles, I finally managed to find another bottle of I.W. Harper. I traveled across the entire country to get it! LOL! This is so good. I'm detecting strawberry on the nose, which transfers to the palate, on this first taste in two years. It's one of my favorite Bourbons ever.

Colt Mcrae 3.3

This is fading from memory, but it was a good time with @ghill40509 on a weekday afternoon. It's undeniable that this surpasses the overpriced 15-year version in its fancy decanter. The profile is similar to JTS Brown bottled in bond - abundant dry oak, vanilla, cherries, allspice, and perhaps a touch of clove and tobacco. It's not outstanding, but for the price, it's another bottle worth strong consideration, outshining the 15-year in both flavor and value.

Earl Hutchison 3.3

Fresh pour, neat in a glencairn. Appearance: light orange amber hue with good legs. Nose: floral, orange, oak, allspice, vanilla, a little caramel. Palate: dry but still pleasant mouthfeel, the nose is better than the palate, nose notes are muted and barely come through, oak and smoke, some cinnamon and vanilla. Almost scotch-like. Finish: okay, not spectacular. Overall: drinks hotter than 82 proof, the palate was a disappointment after a pretty good nose. I'll try it again in a week or two.

Brynn Stark 2.8

Quick Hit Review: This is pleasant. It shows all the classic notes you'd expect from a well-made bourbon, though it leans a bit more towards the lighter, sweeter side. The low proof hinders the aromas and flavors of the nose, palate, and finish, keeping them somewhat muted and nuanced. If there were ever a 7-course whiskey dinner, this would serve as the appetizer, effectively setting the stage for what's to come, but it's definitely NOT the main course. Sláinte PoD!

Imani Herbert 3.3

I disagree with the distiller's assessment here. The nose is sweet and oaky. The palate is smooth with vanilla and a hint of barrel spice. The finish is brief and disappears quickly. I believe its 82 proof limits it. The distiller's 94/100 score is absurd. It's worth the $25, but unremarkable.

Reva Baumgartner 3.0

Nose: Barely perceptible sweetness with floral and vanilla notes. Taste: Uncomplicated, mellow profile featuring corn and vanilla, with just a whisper of floral. Finish: Moderate length with corn and a trace of oak. Lacks depth but it's a solid bourbon experience overall.

44 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.

Tastes like this

Closest flavor profiles across the whole catalog.

All Bourbon