Skip to content
Sip Curator
Grant's Triple Wood Smoky
Grant's

Grant's Triple Wood Smoky

2.76 Mixed reviews

35 reviews35 ratings

Whiskey Scotch Scotland No age statement 40% ABV

Tried it?

How was this pour?

Score this bottle

Rating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.

About this bottle

Announced in July 2018, this blended Scotch whisky incorporates spirits aged in three distinct barrel types: virgin oak, American oak, and refill bourbon barrels. The blend includes peated Scotch whisky, as indicated by its name. A launch in the latter half of 2018 is anticipated.

Reviews

Showing the most detailed of 10 parsed reviews.

Rosanna Cavazos 0.5

Nose: Smells quite tart, like cereal, with faint malt aromas. It's intensely alcoholic and redolent of immature, low-grade grain spirit. The barrels show no influence whatsoever (they must have been completely exhausted) and there's no scent of smoke. A disappointing and unoriginal aroma. Palate: A harsh, fiery, and unpleasant sharp entry that immediately becomes bitter, along with some of the most offensive "smoke" I've experienced. It doesn't resemble genuine peat smoke; it's more akin to a sweetening agent, like the wretched boisé sometimes added to cognac, or the taste of homemade spirit artificially aged with oak fragments. The consistency is weak and watery. Finish: Extremely brief. A lingering sweet and sour aftertaste, but it's purely the sweetness of ethanol. Awful. I had expectations that the peated iteration of a budget blended scotch would surpass the regular expression, but it's the contrary. This is very likely the most regrettable blended spirit I have ever sampled, and to make matters worse, it's hardly the least expensive option available. "Reject It Like A Mad Dog": 55/100 (0.5 stars)

Adonis Morrissey 3.5

This turned out better than anticipated for a Grant's. Nose: Charred smoke, Highland peat, plus the familiar grainy profile of the base Triple Wood. I didn't really care for that base one, but this Smoky edition possesses some intriguing character. Taste: Smoke shifts to Highland peat, followed by a good amount of grainy notes that, surprisingly, taste better than the base edition. I'm strongly considering that I actually like this blend. Finish: Smoke and peat conclude the dram with a moderate finish for its category. Final thoughts: I sampled this after Teacher's and can confidently state this is a slight improvement if you're seeking a peated blend. The peat here is very light and mellow, yet nicely integrated into the typical Grant's profile, which normally lacks any interesting qualities. I'd consider buying it again for mixing.

Makayla Barfield 4.3

Beautifully smooth, virtually no smoke, but more complex than the standard triple wood. In the category of easy-drinking whiskies to sip while doing something else, the price-to-performance is great; it's uncomplicated but not offensive. Actually, I enjoyed it.

Barbara Mireles 2.3

Grain, honey, and a significant amount of alcohol. It develops tones similar to a solvent. A hint of peat emerges towards the finish but is overshadowed by the intense burn of the alcohol. Nevertheless, it surpasses the standard Grants offering.

Gene Schmitz 2.5

A subtle smoky essence that gives way to sweet, buttery toffee, indicating its youth. Some cereal notes are present alongside a gentle fruitiness. The finish is brief.

Nona Shoemaker 3.0

A bit of smokiness and woodiness, combined with alcoholic richness, makes this Grant's quite palatable.

4 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.

Tastes like this

Same style and price bracket, best rated first.

All Scotch