A friend acquired a bottle of this for me while traveling abroad. I had high expectations for this whisky given its age. While it's not bad, it's just too mild and unremarkable. It has a light texture and tastes too much like cereal/grain, followed by a very brief finish. An easy-drinking, inoffensive spirit isn't what a 16-year-old scotch should deliver. Newcomers to scotch might find it smooth, but most beginners don't opt for 16-year expressions. Experienced whisky drinkers will find it boring and uninspired. I rated this 3 stars and won't be buying another bottle. UPDATE: 06/08/2020 Perhaps I was too quick to judge this scotch. After spending more time with it, and with the bottle now two-thirds empty, I've found that the initial taste wasn't truly representative of what this whisky offers. The palate now presents a nice mix of subtle fruits and caramel, concluding with a hint of malt, sweet toffee, and ripe strawberries/cherries. The finish is still a bit short for a 16-year-old scotch, but overall, it's starting to win me over, leading me to adjust my rating. I also tried adding some water, but I don't suggest it as it thins an already light texture and doesn't enhance the experience.
Glen Deveron 16 Year
Whiskey Scotch Highlands 16 Year 40% ABV
Tried it?
How was this pour?
Score this bottleRating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.
About this bottle
Macduff Distillery, located on Scotland's northeastern coast, crafts single malts under the Glen Deveron name. The 16-year-old bottling, released in 2013, is the youngest in the Royal Burgh Collection and is available in 1L bottles at 40% ABV, offered exclusively through Global Travel Retail alongside 20 and 30-year-old expressions.
How it tastes
Measured across 14 flavor axes. Tap a note to find other bottles that lead with it.
Reviews
Showing the most detailed of 26 parsed reviews.
Absolutely not, no, no, no... This is unpleasant. It's not like gasoline, but that's hardly a reason to want to drink it. The aroma is disappointing with hints of honeycomb and heather, reminiscent of an Aberfeldy (and I'm not fond of that distillery). The palate has a subtle smokiness with an odd note of cooked fat (like bacon without the meat). The finish is a nosedive from an already mediocre whisky, being both short and sweet.
Nose: Rich with notes of plums and raisins, cherries, and leather. Palate: Abundant honey at first. Fruity with some vanilla on the palate as well. Quite smooth and full-bodied. Finish: Medium length finish where the sherry cask influence is apparent. I'm not detecting any peat, nor does the bottle mention it. I thoroughly enjoyed this whisky, contrary to the reviews from the expert and others.
People are quite critical given what this bottle costs. It's true it lacks depth and doesn't have a strong peat presence, if that's what you're seeking. However, if you prefer a smooth drink that's rich in fruit flavors with a brief finish and minimal heat, you might enjoy this. Just don't anticipate impressing acquaintances with it as a sophisticated 16-year-old spirit. Would I purchase it again? Yes, if it's on sale.
A pleasant whisky for sipping, though it lacks distinct character and any peatiness. On the nose: very fruity and sweet, with cinnamon. The palate is sweet, featuring vanilla, cinnamon, and caramel, with a gentle oak spice. The aftertaste begins with pepper and sweetness, lasting a moderate duration.
The nose has notes of fruit and malt. A very mild smokiness is present, followed by a burning sensation on the tongue. The finish is acidic and hot. It's not the finest, but it's not the worst either.
20 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.
Tastes like this
Closest flavor profiles across the whole catalog.