I'm draining this bottle with this pour. Finally. It was extremely tough to get through, especially since I had to buy it in a 1.75L, but I suppose that's the price for the cheapest, most awful scotch available. Nose: Abundant sulfur and vegetal scents. It's clearly young, and the presence of heads and tails is quite evident. Yikes. It does possess a slightly rich aroma, though perhaps that's a bad sign. A considerable amount of alcohol is present. The aroma is not good or intricate. Palate: This is rather harsh. The unpleasant flavors do a decent job of masking the industrial ones, however. Hooray? I detect significant sulfur and vegetal notes, along with possibly something bitterly and astringently herbal. A subtle hint of chocolate is also there. Not complex, but certainly rich. It feels like someone tasted an Islay scotch and assumed any rich, bitter, strongly flavored scotch would be appealing. Some caramel sweetness and a whisper of cereal offer a bit of balance, preventing it from being a complete disaster, but it's aggressively bad. Finish: The sulfur lingers, accompanied by faint herbal and vegetal notes, plus some caramel, cereal, and smoky chocolate. The burning sensation eventually subsides, making it superior to the palate, but that's setting a very low standard. I'd rank this below Glen Ness. It might even be worse than Glen Logie, as I can envision masking Glen Logie in a drink, but not this. Piper's Clan presents a slightly more appealing profile as well. This is somehow even more overpowering with the sulfur. Yes, it's a bit richer with a hint of chocolate, but intense flavors don't equate to enjoyment like a peat bomb. I must say, I favor both Glen Logie and Piper's Clan over this, and I only rated them a 3. A touch of complexity with a couple of hints of pleasant flavors prevent this from being a 1. Well, maybe they keep it from a 1. I'll give it a 2 for now, and I certainly won't purchase another bottle to determine if it truly warrants a 1 out of 23. Ugh, side-by-side, this is considerably worse than Piper's Clan, but I'll stick with my 2 rating for the moment.
Clan MacGregor Blended Scotch Whisky
2.45 Mixed reviews
Whiskey Scotch Scotland No age statement 40% ABV
Tried it?
How was this pour?
Score this bottleRating a bottle takes an account, so your scores follow you and count towards the number everyone else reads.
About this bottle
This blended Scotch whisky honors the MacGregor clan, one of Scotland's most ancient lineages, with origins tracing back to the 14th century. It is a combination of malt and grain whiskies sourced from across Scotland and is bottled at 80 proof.
Reviews
Showing the most detailed of 29 parsed reviews.
Wow, this is really low-grade stuff. It's not actively unpleasant, but all the characteristics are on the negative side, and the flavor is so faint it's almost shameful. There are hints of malt, smoke, and some sweet element, but that's essentially it. Some tartness is present, but this is truly as generic as Scotch gets. There's nothing to recommend it, though the flavors do vary slightly. Honestly, it's quite hard to get down. There are floral notes and touches of honey, but it's a jumble of unappealing flavors. It desperately needs more time to age. That might not be sufficient to salvage it, however. The aroma has a slightly sour quality but also a hint of cocoa. Mostly, it just smells strongly of damp tobacco and wood. The palate is bitter, with cocoa and tobacco mingling with sea spray, but it's somewhat like carrying wet luggage. There's a slight sweetness, but it mostly tastes as if a tiny bit of grog was sprayed on. It's not the absolute worst thing imaginable, but it's pretty bad. The harshness is somewhat more than anticipated, but not unreasonable. A larger sip reveals a richer and more pronounced flavor, but everything tends to merge together. It possesses some pleasant grain and malt components, nicely showcasing the raw elements of the blend. There's also a touch of fruitiness that's somewhat floral, with hints of apricot and definitely some vanilla. It would be quite palatable if it weren't overwhelmed by sulfur. Some alcohol is noticeable. As an acquired taste and under specific conditions, it's somewhat drinkable (basically, if you're accustomed to the sulfur and have already had your palate somewhat occupied). Sulfur is undeniably the dominant flavor. It's revolting. The malt isn't as overpowering as that found in Westward, though it's also a lighter spirit. And it has a lot of sulfur. An immense amount, really. Who would have thought this was possible. This has fewer sharp flavor notes than Westward, though it's also less robust with a more subdued mouthfeel. Still, the flavor isn't weak, and those fruity, floral notes prevent it from being a complete failure. The sulfur reminds me of San Matias Legado Blanco, but more extreme with some fruitiness to partially balance it.
I sampled this whiskey as part of my exploration of affordable Scotches. I am searching for value-priced Scotches that distinguish themselves. I aim to find a couple that I can keep stocked that are easy on the wallet. On the nose, this offering is unremarkable—mostly acetone. It’s a thin whiskey on the palate with hints of oak, heat, and salt. The finish is perhaps its best feature: warm honey. This is my second experience with a budget scotch. My first was The Famous Grouse, which I neglected to review even after finishing two bottles. Clan is priced (in my region) a full $10 less than Grouse, making it a definite contender. Seriously, $14 for a bottle of scotch! Incredible! After three evenings of tasting this whisky, I can say it's not the worst I've encountered. I've enjoyed Speyside varieties less. Here's the key with Clan, though: When you add a little water (as suggested by the folks at the Whiskey Vault), this whisky awakens. After that, it tastes like something I'd keep on hand. I'm eager to discover what my budget scotch journey brings next. Moving on to The Famous Grouse for a full assessment.
Appearance: It had a light honey gold hue. The dram exhibited medium to thick, extra oily legs. Nose: The aroma was generally floral, with hints of honeysuckle, smoke, grapes, and orange peel. Taste: The palate had a pleasant, round body, featuring fruity notes of apples, pear, smoke, and orange, with a bitter grapefruit-like note towards the end. Finish: The finish was of medium length, leaving a fresh aftertaste, though it had a slight bite going down. Thoughts: I acquired this scotch for the Super Bowl yesterday, not anticipating much. However, I was genuinely impressed by its drinkability and value, despite being a bottom-shelf blend. It was an honorable dram for $14.00, and I thoroughly enjoyed it, offering a recommendation. Clan MacGregor, thank you for the enjoyable dram. “Will the MacGregor’s ever be kings again?” “All men with honor are kings. But not all kings have honor.” -Rob Roy. Cheers!
Clan MacGregor Blended Scotch, 40% abv. Aged 3 years (the minimum). Made in Scotland, imported and bottled in the US by Alexander MacGregor&Co. (Edison, New Jersey). Found this in glass (1 liter) on Catalina Island. Normally I only see it in the big plastic 1.75L's. Aroma: odd notes, minor sweetness/sherry, grainy, not much aroma. Taste: moderate to high sweetness/sherry note, grainy, minor oak notes, minor spice finish, very smooth, has a generic scotch flavor. Tastes better than it smells, no major off notes. The flavor is not the boldest, biggest, or longest lasting. It's an average/high average cheap scotch. My go-to liquor store has this for 16 dollars for a plastic 1.75L. Cost: ~15 plus tax (1 liter) Grade: C+
To be direct and honest, I'm unsure how to rate this whiskey. Overall, it's not outstanding. It offers the basic notes expected from a blended scotch, with some peat. However, considering its $15 price point, it earns 5 stars. I believe every scotch enthusiast should keep a bottle of this on hand as it's very decent for such a low cost. If you've sampled several Ardbegs or Laphroaigs and your palate is quite fatigued for the evening, this is an excellent budget whiskey to conclude the night. It won't provide a rich, complex experience, but it serves its purpose as a scotch.
23 more reviews were collected for this bottle. The longest ones are shown first.
Tastes like this
Same style and price bracket, best rated first.